|
FINANCIAL CLAIMS
Stage 4: The FDR Appointment
The purpose of the FDR is facilitate discussion
to help the parties reach a settlement. The FDR hearing
is in effect a meeting of the parties and their legal representatives
at which discussions and negotiations take place. Therefore
it is essential the both parties attend the hearing unless
the Court has ordered otherwise. The parties are usually
required to attend one hour early so that there is time
to enter into discussions before going in front of the Judge.
The hearing before the Judge is an
informal one. The Judge will have looked at the papers and
read the offers made in order to ascertain the difference
between each parties’ position. During the course of the
hearing there may be intervals so that parties can consider
their position and enter further discussions where there
is a prospect of a compromise. The parties are free to air
their views and proposals in front of the Judge who can
freely give guidance on the best outcome and what in his/her
the Court is likely to order at a final hearing. This gives
the parties a realistic expectation of what they can achieve
if they decide not to settle and proceed to a final hearing.
As the Judge will have heard and read
the parties’ proposals he will not be able to have any further
involvement in the case after the FDR. At the end of the
FDR the offers/ proposals which the parties had filed with
the Court are returned to the parties so that they do not
remain on the Court file and be available to be read by
the Judge who sits at the final hearing.
If the parties have reached an agreement
the Judge can make a Consent
Order if the terms are approved
by him. If the parties have not been able to reach a settlement
then the Judge may either make further directions or list
the case for a final hearing.
A high proportion of cases either
settle at the FDR or very soon afterwards.
|